Although patients' rights to receive high-quality health care have been codified in many laws, rules, and other regulations, no collection of policy statements or regulatory requirements ensures that the right care is always delivered the right way and at the right time. Considering the subjective and varied manners in which patients experience their health and their care, even articulating what constitutes quality health care can be challenging.

Over the last several decades, many authors, researchers, policymakers, and other stakeholders have endeavored to define quality. The National Academy of Medicine defines quality as “the degree to which health services for individuals and populations increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes and are consistent with current professional knowledge.”1 However, the subjectivity and disparate perspectives of providers and patients—which are sometimes at odds with one another—serve as a useful lens for understanding the factors that impair quality.

Article authors include Leasa Novak, MS, LNHA, LPN, BCC, BCPA, Livanta's Communications Director; Dr. Ellen Evans, Livanta Chief Medical Officer; and Carmen Villegas, Livanta's Immediate Advocacy Manager.

The full-text article is available in the May/June 2022 issue of Journal of Health Care Compliance.